The Good Service scale was devised by Lou Downe based on the 15 principles of good service design.
Give your service a score from 0 – 4 on how well it delivers against each principle based on these criteria:
- It is not possible for users to do this
- A small minority of users can do this with extreme difficulty or effort
- Some users can do this, but it still requires difficulty or effort for most
- Most users can do this, but it requires difficulty or effort for some
- All users can do this easily and consistently
Your score
0-20 – Level 1 – Bad
It is not possible for all but the most expert and determined users to find and use this service.
It may pose significant risks to those users who are able use it by encouraging unsafe behaviours, and may make it extremely difficult for users to understand and resolve issues when they arise.
21-30 – Level 2 – Poor
Though a minority of users might be able to complete your service it is unlikely to get them to the goal they need to achieve
The majority your users are likely to struggle to find or use your service, either because it is not inclusive, or it is designed for expert use.
31-40 – Level 3 – Unsatisfactory
Though some users will be able to use your service to reach their desired goal, the service is still difficult to use for the majority of users, and is likely to favour those with time and previous experience
Your users may face delays in the use of your service due to organisational silos or unnecessary bureaucracy, and may still become confused by inconsistencies in the service or ways of working that are unfamiliar
41-50 – Level 4 – Moderate
Most users are able to find and use your service successfully, although some users may stil be excluded
A user’s ability to achieve the goal they set out to achieve, in one seamless service is still likely to be made more difficult by organisational silos or more inconsistencies in your service
51-60 – Level 5 – Good
Your service is easily findable and usable by anyone who needs to use it, enabling all users to consistently achieve the goal they set out to achieve.
Your service is likely to encourage behaviours that benefit not just your user and staff, but society and the planet as a whole
Oh, and well done!
What to do with your results
For each principle, ask the following questions:
- What is your service failing to do for users?
- For example, the name of the service contains an acronym that some users will find hard to understand unless they’re already familiar with it
- What does good look like for your service?
- For example, the name of our service clearly describes what our users need to do, instead of A.S.H.E.E.P we should call the service something like ‘legally move sheep or goats’ or ‘register the legal status of a sheep or goat’
- What’s stopping your service doing this now?
- For example, Policymakers named the service when it was created (a long time ago!), we don’t know who owns the change or whether we’re allowed to change it
- What could you do to change it?
- For example, gather evidence on how users find it difficult to find our service. Look at the number or people who need to use the service and compare that to those who do so now
What data do we store?
None. Any input is dealt with entirely in your browser. No data is sent to our server, or to analytics.
We don't know what you do when you're here.
Open source
You can view the javascript that does this by viewing the source of this page, or on the Codepen where it was written.
There is no licence. Take it where you will.




